Marathon Review – Excellent Gunplay Can’t Rescue a Confusing Shooter

Recommended products

This page contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, we earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Even Destiny’s brilliant gunplay can’t redeem Marathon from its own confusion. Plagued by a troubled development, Bungie’s new shooter drowns in excessive visual noise, rudimentary menus, and boredom. The extraction shooter disappoints, fails to innovate, and becomes tiresome long before it’s fun. Its greatest strength—refined gunplay—is undermined by a sea of questionable design choices. When Bungie decided to resurrect Marathon as an extraction shooter, curiosity was high, considering the studio redefined modern gunplay with Halo and Destiny. However, after dozens of hours in raids and frantic battles, the experience leaves the reviewer with a headache and a sense of emptiness.

The final product’s disjointed nature reflects the game’s troubled development. Marathon’s creation involved Bungie dealing with layoffs, painful internal restructuring, and immense financial pressure under Sony’s control. The game betrays this instability throughout, as if conflicting visions were forced to coexist. A prime example of this was the mid-project leadership change, when Christopher Barrett was replaced by Joe Ziegler, formerly Valorant’s director, causing a noticeable shift in the game’s direction. Ziegler altered the original vision to focus more on competitive aspects and hero classes, sacrificing personalization and immersion. The result of these corporate changes is the current product: a technically sound base lost amid disjointed ideas. Overwhelming Sensations and the Nightmare of Menus The game’s artistic direction and visuals are immediately alienating. Marathon’s aesthetics are polarizing; some players appreciate its unique style, while others find it jarring. The menus, with their harsh contrast and small text, cause eye strain even on larger screens, seeming like an afterthought compared to the polished gunplay and core mechanics. A Deceptive Progression System and the Solitary Survival Experience

Marathon’s flawed progression system further exacerbates the monotonous gameplay loop. As players progress, they find better loot and supposedly stronger build options; however, the game inadequately explains the true impact of these choices. The skills tree lacks clear paths or defined directions; players unlock abilities and advantages as they become available without feeling like they’re constructing a specific build. The same applies to gear and implants (colors). Item descriptions are so vague that equipment choices are often based solely on rarity color (green is better than gray, blue is better than green) rather than informed tactical decisions, removing all excitement from improving the arsenal.

Amidst this structure, the existence of Rook, a Runner Shell designed exclusively for single-player experiences, provides a genuine surprise—especially for solo players. Playing as Rook drastically alters Marathon’s atmosphere, bringing it closer to a survival horror game. Players take on the role of this small, solitary robot in a three-player game, equipped only with basic survival gear. Rook’s advantages are the ability to become temporarily invisible to avoid enemy squads and AI, as well as regain health and shield over time. It’s a low-risk, high-reward experience based heavily on stealth, and it’s one of the rare mechanics that offers something different from what’s already available in many other games. In conclusion, Marathon is an experience of brief highs and deep lows. It boasts refined and addictive gunplay that makes players want to play “one more time,” but the game loses itself amid poorly presented concepts. Buried under a confusing artistic direction, painful menus, and a repetitive extraction cycle, Bungie delivered a fundamentally basic game that adds little to the market.

Unrealized Potential: Marathon’s Mixed Shooter Journey with Tough Combat and Repetition

Critics gave mixed reviews to Marathon, Bungie’s new shooter. Some praised its shooting mechanics and art direction, while others criticized its limited content and initial confusion. Ravi Sinha of GamingBolt called it an interesting alternative in the extraction shooter genre for teams of three who aren’t afraid of tough combat and grinding. Dariusz Matusiak of GRYOnline.pl stated that it’s a special project with some merit but needs work on content, layout, navigation, and repetitive gameplay. Peter Dragula of SECTOR.sk found that it had a promising foundation, with solid shooting mechanics, movement, and tactical decision-making during extractions, but agreed that it lacked content and has a long way to go before becoming a full hit. Ultimately, Marathon emerges as a game with unrealized potential, its strengths overshadowed by design flaws and a troubled development.

In Case You Missed It

In a delightful double dose of news, Ahmed Hassan has just shared his insights on the launch of TV Unifimes in Mineiros, Goiás, a stride towards information democratization that’s sure to impact local culture and education Mineiros, Goiás, Gains Public Channel with Inauguration of TV Unifimes. Meanwhile, Bruno Pferd brings us exciting updates from Rio de Janeiro where the Digital Caravan is rolling in with free tech courses for youth and adults, aiming to train three thousand individuals in high-demand skills like robotics Digital Caravan Arrives in Rio de Janeiro with Free Technology Courses for Youth and Adults. And speaking of nostalgia, Bruno also dishes on the long wait for Lilo & Stitch 2 and the Inside Out sequel, with Disney CEO Josh D’Amaro sharing his plans to blend nostalgia with original storytelling Long Wait Announced for Lilo & Stitch 2.